JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 22, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Maria Angela Gelvez Rico Vs. Empresa Social Del Estado Francisco De Paula Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero De Menores De Bucaramanga Y El Juzgado Segundo De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Cucuta. Ordena Al Juzgado Primero De Menores De Bucaramanga Asumir El Conocimiento De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Competencia a prevención
  • Por factor funcional
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (22 points)
  1. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  2. Primero. de Menores de Bucaramanga que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia.
  3. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  4. Presidente
  5. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  6. Magistrado
  7. CON SALVAMENTO DE VOTO
  8. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  9. Magistrado
  10. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  11. Magistrado
  12. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  13. Magistrado
  14. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  15. Magistrado
  16. HUMBERTO SIERRA PORTO
  17. Magistrado
  18. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  19. Magistrado
  20. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  21. Magistrada
  22. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.